NAM Disclosures for California Consumer Arbitrations

Need to submit a case and have all of your information ready? Feel free to submit all required information right here. Once we have received the case information, our case management team will get this matter set up and contact all parties as soon as possible to get working on next steps. If you encounter any difficulty entering your case data please contact Jackie Streffacio at 516.941.3267.

As required by Section 1281.96 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, information regarding consumer arbitrations administered by NAM in the State of California is available by clicking on the link contained herein. The disclosure includes the name of the non-consumer party, the type of dispute, the result of the arbitration and the number of times the non-consumer party has been a party in an arbitration administered by NAM.

This disclosure reflects consumer arbitrations administered by NAM in the State of California since January, 2003 and is updated quarterly.

For additional information, please contact NAM at 1-800-358-2550 Attn: Consumer Arbitration Dept.

List Consumer Arbitration Cases:

Case Caption:      Claimant vs. VW Credit Leasing Ltd.
Date Submitted:  1/9/18
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range: n/a
Claim Amount:  Not specified- seeks special, general and punitive damages in an amount to be determined
Disposition: Pending
Prevailing party/award:  n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $150
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:
Arbitrator: not yet appointed
Appointment Date:  n/a
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 8

Case Caption:  Claimant vs.  D.B.A. Diane’s Incorporated, its parents, subsidiaries and related companies
Date Submitted:  11/21/17
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: pending
Prevailing party/award:  pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:  pending
Arbitrator: David Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date: 1/22/18
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:  10/5/17
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: n/a
Claim Amount:  $37,246+
Disposition: Pending
Prevailing party/award:  n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $0
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:100%
Arbitrator: Darryl J. Horowitt, Esq.
Appointment Date:  11/17/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:  Claimant v Princess Cruise Lines, LTD & Steiner Management Services, LLC
Date Submitted:  8/14/17
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range:  n/a
Claim Amount:  $ unknown
Disposition: pending
Prevailing party/award:  pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: pending
Arbitrator: David Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:  11/14/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 5 (Princess)

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:  6/14/17
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: $100,000/yr
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: pending
Prevailing party/award:  pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator: John Larson, Esq.
Appointment Date:  7/21/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:  6/13/17
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:  n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $4,221.03
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator: David Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:  6/13/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Audi Beverly Hills, A company wholly owned by Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc.
Date Submitted:  4/13/17
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range:  n/a
Claim Amount:  $ 40,000+
Disposition: pending/case stayed
Prevailing party/award:  pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: pending
Arbitrator: Elizabeth Moreno, Esq.
Appointment Date:  6/12/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 1

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. PAG Santa Ana AVW Inc dba Audi South Coast
Date Submitted: 4/11/17
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range: n/a
Claim Amount:  $30,288.61
Disposition: pending
Prevailing party/award:  pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: pending
Arbitrator: Janathan Allen, Esq.
Appointment Date:  7/25/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Princess Cruise Lines
Date Submitted: 12/7/16
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range: n/a
Claim Amount:  $12,900
Disposition: Award rendered
Prevailing party/award:  Claimant
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $5,728.70
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 5%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 95%
Arbitrator: David Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:  4/27/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 5

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. CardinalWay Volkswagen, Saul Chevrolet Inc and VW Credit Leasing Ltd.
Date Submitted:  12/1/16
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range:  n/a
Claim Amount:  $250,000 +
Disposition: Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:  n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $750.
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator: Settled prior to appointment
Appointment Date:  n/a
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 8 (VW Credit Leasing)

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Jones BH Acquisition Group, LLC d/b/a Audi Beverly Hills
Date Submitted:  8/26/16
Case Type:  Consumer
Salary Range: n/a
Claim Amount:  $55,000
Disposition: Award
Prevailing party/award:  Claimant- Lease rescinded, $41,989.26 for attorneys’ fees plus all payments made (less $4,500)

plus costs of arbitration
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $13.923
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 2%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 98%
Arbitrator: Michael Harrison, Esq.
Appointment Date:  1/9/17
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 1

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Citrus Hospitality Management d/b/a Perch Restaurant
Date Submitted:  7/18/16
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:  n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel: Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $5,158.96
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 1.5%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 98.5%
Arbitrator: David Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:  11/21/16
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    11/9/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    unknown
Claim Amount:    unknown
Disposition:   Settled
Prevailing party/award:   n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $2,761
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:   100%
Arbitrator:    Matthew Hawkins, Esq.
Appointment Date:    12/7/16
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Galpin Volkswagon of San Fernando Valley
Date Submitted:    9/28/2016
Case Type:    Consumer
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $75,000
Disposition:    Pending/Case Stayed
Prevailing party/award:    Pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    Pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    Pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    Pending
Arbitrator:   Elizabeth Moreno, Esq.
Appointment Date:    12/12/16
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    9/19/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    unknown
Claim Amount:    unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $11,610
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Cynthia Gittt, Esq.
Appointment Date:    12/22/16
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Walter Timmons Enterprises, Inc.
Date Submitted:    8/22/2016
Case Type:    Consumer
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $16,782
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    N/A
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $235
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:   100%
Arbitrator:    Settled prior to appointment
Appointment Date:    N/A
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    8/11/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $3,797
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Maria C. Roberts, Esq.
Appointment Date:    9/9/2016
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Q & S Automotive, LLC d/b/a Audi of Oakland
Date Submitted: 7/11/16
Case Type:    Consumer
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $139,291.36
Disposition:    Pending
Prevailing party/award:    Pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    Pending
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    Pending
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    Pending
Arbitrator:    L. Thomas Wagner, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/22/16
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Santa Monica Audi
Date Submitted:    7/7/2016
Case Type:    Consumer
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $50,001
Disposition:    Case settled prior to Arbitrator:’s award
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $8,202
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    3.5%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:   96.5%
Arbitrator:    Michael Kerbs, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/8/2016
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 0

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    4/14/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    unknown
Claim Amount:    unknown
Disposition:    Dismissal/failure to prosecute
Prevailing party/award:    Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    No
Fee Paid to NAM:    $9,144.07
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    David B. Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:    5/25/2016
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    4/11/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:   Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:   Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $7,645.58
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Michael Kerbs, Esq.
Appointment Date:    5/5/2016
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    1/19/2016
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    unknown
Claim Amount:    unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:   n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $2,778.27
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Terry Wills, Esq.
Appointment Date:    2/25/2016
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    10/26/2015
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $3,055.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Emily Boyle, Esq.
Appointment Date:    11/17/2015
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    9/30/2015
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $10,993.22
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Mark H. Van Brussel, Esq.
Appointment Date:    10/28/15
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    9/8/2015
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    None
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $4,606.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Mark S. Adams, Esq.
Appointment Date:    10/14/2015
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted:    6/23/2015
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:   Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    Settled
Claimant Represented by Counsel:   Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $18,478.14
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    John B. Larson, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/7/2015
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. TA Operating LLC d/b/a Travel Centers of America, LLC
Date Submitted: 6/2/15
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:  Settled
Claimant Represented by Counsel: yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $2,307
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator:  Eve H. Wagner, Esq.
Appointment Date:  8/11/15
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 8

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. CarMax
Date Submitted: 4/11/15
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Dismissed by motion/failure to prosecute
Prevailing party/award:  Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel: no
Fee Paid to NAM:  $3791.50
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator:  Daphne M. Anneet, Esq.
Appointment Date:  5/7/15
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Reit Management and Research LLC
Date Submitted: 12/16/14
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:  Settled
Claimant Represented by Counsel: yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $1,795
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator:  Eve H. Wagner, Esq.
Appointment Date:  3/5/15
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 2

Case Caption:  Claimant vs. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
Date Submitted: 8/15/14
Case Type:  Employment
Salary Range: unknown
Claim Amount:  unknown
Disposition: Dismissed by motion
Prevailing party/award:  Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel: yes
Fee Paid to NAM:  $27,848.50
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant: 0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent: 100%
Arbitrator:  Deborah Maddux, Esq.
Appointment Date:  10/8/14
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 80

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores
Date Submitted:    7/15/2014
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $5,585.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Brandon McKelvey, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/27/2014
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Western Union Financial Services
Date Submitted:    7/14/2014
Case Type:    Commercial
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $3,404.58
Disposition:    Settled Prior to Arbitration Appointment
Prevailing party/award:    None
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    No
Fee Paid to NAM:    $125.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    100%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    0%
Arbitrator:    n/a
Appointment Date:    N/A
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 7

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    11/26/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled prior to hearing
Prevailing party/award:    n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $5,559.69
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Craig R. Scott, Esq.
Appointment Date:    3/13/2014
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    10/16/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Decision Rendered
Prevailing party/award:    Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    No
Fee Paid to NAM:    16,037.37
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Mathew Hawkins, Esq.
Appointment Date:    11/25/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    8/7/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Decision Rendered
Prevailing party/award:    Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $ 82,020.34
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    David B. Van Etten, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/26/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    7/22/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Claimant withdrew claim
Prevailing party/award:    None
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $2,647.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:   100%
Arbitrator:    MIchael Lubrani, Esq.
Appointment Date:    8/21/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    6/28/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Decision Rendered
Prevailing party/award:    Claimant
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $80,162.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Linda Klibanow, Esq.
Appointment Date:    7/19/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Western Union Financial Services
Date Submitted:    6/20/2013
Case Type:    Commercial
Salary Range:    N/A
Claim Amount:    $2,400.00
Disposition:    Claimant withdrew claim
Prevailing party/award:    None
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $4,330.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    5.3%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    94.7%
Arbitrator:    Hon. Lawrence W. Crispo [Ret.]
Appointment Date:    10/8/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 7

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    6/3/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled
Prevailing party/award:   n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $28,997.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Everett F. Meiners, Esq.
Appointment Date:    7/5/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Princess Cruises
Date Submitted:    3/12/2013
Case Type:    Claim Related to Services
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Claimant withdrew claim
Prevailing party/award:    Pending
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $0.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    0%
Arbitrator:    Arbitrator: not appointed
Appointment Date:    Not Scheduled
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 1

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    3/11/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Settled
Prevailing party/award:   n/a
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $4,631.00
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Christine Page, Esq.
Appointment Date:    5/14/2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

Case Caption:    Claimant vs. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Date Submitted:    2/15/2013
Case Type:    Employment
Salary Range:    Unknown
Claim Amount:    Unknown
Disposition:    Decision Rendered
Prevailing party/award:    Respondent
Claimant Represented by Counsel:    Yes
Fee Paid to NAM:    $52,291.14
Percent of Fee paid by Claimant:    0%
Percent of Fee Paid by Respondent:    100%
Arbitrator:    Eve H. Wagner, Esq.
Appointment Date:    April 2, 2013
Number of times Respondent has been a party in Arbitration at NAM other than subject case: 101

As of 3/13/18